Skip to main content
SBIR Phase III Partnering Requirements

Partnering with a SBIR company for Phase III sole source contracts, rules on Phase III subcontracting

E
Written by Eric Adolphe
Updated over 9 months ago

February 01, 2024

This page will be updated as new information becomes available.

DOD 5000.02 Implementation of 15 U.S.C. 638 (Ref. (j)

Under the guidelines specified by the 5000.02 SBIR/STTR Statutory requirement, it is mandatory for large businesses to form partnerships with an SBIR company. This collaboration aims to incorporate the SBIR company's products, services, or research findings into various programs to fulfill the goals set by task orders. If the value of this BPA/IDIQ surpasses $100 million, the large business is obligated to grant a Phase III subcontract. Additionally, they must annually report the financial worth of this subcontract to the Agency for documentation purposes. This mandate is grounded in the legislative framework provided by 15 U.S.C. 638 (Ref. (j)).

(5) Insertion incentives

For any contract with a value of not less than $100,000,000, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to-

  • (A) establish goals for the transition of Phase III technologies in subcontracting plans; and

  • (B) require a prime contractor on such a contract to report the number and dollar amount of contracts entered into by that prime contractor for Phase III SBIR or STTR projects.

DOD 5000.02 Implementation of 15 U.S.C. 638 (Ref. (j)

The SBIR Policy Directive limits subcontracting on Phase I SBIRs to 33%, and 50% on Phase IIs. Up to 60% of the research effort for an STTR project can be subcontracted. However, the Policy Directive does not impose subcontracting limits on a Phase III contract.

Guidance recommending Phase III- DoDI 5000.02. SBIR Phase IIIs are not small business set asides contracts because size standards do not apply to a Phase III funding agreement. See https://www.sbir.gov/tutorials/data-rights/tutorial-4 (exemption from SBA size standards for a procurement), and https://afwerx.com/divisions/afventures/phase-iii/ (Importantly, a Phase III contract may be awarded to a firm which has outgrown the small business size standard, to a novated awardee, or to a successor in interest, such as a large company that acquired the small business).

Size standards define the largest size a business can be to participate in government contracting programs and compete for contracts reserved or set aside for small businesses. Size standards vary by industry and are generally based on the number of employees or the amount of annual receipts the business has. You can find small business size regulations in Title 13 Part 121 of the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR).

Conclusion:

For the reasons above (Phase III is exempt from Size Standards, and Size Standards are used to qualify a firm to participate in small business set aside contracts), a Phase III contract is not a small bushiness set aside. Furthermore, because a Phase III is not a set aside, the 51% workshare requirements by prime contractors do not apply (5% - 20% acceptable). A relevant GAO bid protest decision is available here

This conclusion is supported by the fact that according to the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), the top ten Phase III contractors are large businesses (greater than 500 employees, and more than a $1B in annual revenue).

Top SBIR Phase III Revenues from FY20 through FY23:

Vendor

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Grand Total ($K)

1.

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION (acquisition of Progeny Systems, LLC)

$146,396

$155,132

$141,949

$65,207

$508,684

2.

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION (acquisition of Alliant Techsystems Operations, LLC)

$113,246

$142,634

$140,096

$62,194

$458,170

3.

FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC

$105,174

$117,774

$92,703

$86,253

$401,904

4.

ANDURIL INDUSTRIES, INC.

$96,022

$67,366

$132,782

$100,485

$396,655

5.

CUBIC CORPORATION (acquisition of GATR Technologies, Inc.)

$92,099

$114,233

$96,981

$21,970

$325,283

6.

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION (acquired by Mercury Systems, Inc)

$70,160

$36,171

$48,492

$76,766

$231,589

7.

COSMIC ADVANCED ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS, INC. (acquired by Kratos Defense & Security Systems, Inc.)

$11,687

$19,618

$78,451

$88,805

$198,561

8.

THE PERDUCO GROUP, INC. (A LINQUEST COMPANY)

$34,552

$56,149

$86,913

$19,150

$196,765

9.

SABEL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC

$15,752

$44,516

$47,466

$78,759

$186,493

10.

AEYON, LLC

$25,027

$40,264

$45,275

$59,307

$169,872

Need Further Assistance?

Our Knowledge Academy is integrated with Generative AI (GAI) technology to answer your questions directly. Access it by tapping the purple button on the bottom right of your screen:

© 2024 Forward Edge-AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

Did this answer your question?